Using the Torx T8 screwdriver bit, unscrew the screws for the wireless shroud. Twist the black base counter-clockwise to unlock the base, and gently lift the base clear of the device.
8gb ram mac mini 2011 mac#
Either one should meet all your needs (personally I'd go with the mini as I already have all the peripherals I need, but if I didn't I'd probably buy the iMac.). Flip over the Mac Mini so the open and closed dots are facing you. 8GB DDR3 RAM is a good addition to Apple MacBooks and iMacs manufactured between 2011 - 2014. If you're likely to be doing one thing at a time, go with the iMac. Mac users demand the highest performance from their systems.
8gb ram mac mini 2011 upgrade#
If you're going to be running processor-heavy tasks in the background while using, go with the mini. A-Tech 8GB RAM for Apple MacBook Pro (Early/Late 2011), iMac (Mid 2010 27 inch 4-Core, Mid 2011 21.5/27 inch), Mac Mini (Mid 2011) DDR3 1333MHz PC3-10600 204-Pin SODIMM Memory Upgrade Module 134 31 99 Get it as soon as Wed, Nov 10 FREE Shipping by Amazon More Buying Choices 31. The Core 2 duo will actually handle single threaded apps a bit better. For processor intensive tasks, I'd likely go with the mini, but ONLY if the apps make use of virtual cores. HDD Is upgradeable, and you CAN add a second with a cable (sold separately), but you are limited to 2.5" form factor, which is fine if you want SSDs but annoying in every other way, as 2.5" platter drives have a much higher failure rate than 3.5" and anything about 500-600gb is prohibitively expensive currently, so not great if you have an extensive media library.įor uses, if you are using it for web surfing/netflix watching/email/light photo and such, both will work perfectly well. Also in the "future proof" realm, a mini will make a great home media server when you eventually replace it (13W at idle, it's kind of ideal for the task), the iMac will likely collect dust at that point (unless you have kids) Small, lightweight, non-obtrusive, and kind of cool looking The Apple Mac mini 'Core i7' 2.0 Server (Mid-2011) features a 32-nm 'Sandy Bridge' Quad Core 2.0 GHz Intel 'Core i7' (2635QM) processor with four independent processor 'cores' on a single chip, a 6 MB shared level 3 cache, 4 GB of 1333 MHz DDR3 SDRAM (PC3-10600) memory, dual 500 GB hard drives, and Intel HD Graphics 3000 with 384 MB of memory.
Thunderbolt, which is currently still all but useless, but is allegedly going to be like SCSI on steroids and coke at the same time
FAR superior GPU, but really only relevant to video editing, powering super large displays, or high end gaming All in one means less wasted space and is very good if you don't already have a monitor slightly more upgradeable (larger/more HDD options, mostly, though you can hack in a second drive or eSata port not sure is RAM is maxed for that model but 12gb is plenty)
It really depends what you're doing with it, but really for the home user, either machine will be fine (and both are 64-bit they may have meant that the virtual cores are 64-bit in the above quote, but it can definitely be read as saying the iMac isn't-also, I heartily agree with the 8gb comment, I've never needed more other than in my workstation editing HD video).
0 kommentar(er)
